The WM Review

The WM Review

What Leo XIV's 'complete commitment' to Vatican II REALLY means

Our explanation as to how and why we can be sure that the Holy See has been vacant since at least 1965.

S.D. Wright's avatar
S.D. Wright
Jun 03, 2025
∙ Paid
23
25
7
Share
AGENZIA SINTESI / Alamy Stock Photo (LICENCE PAID). As Amazon Associates, we earn from qualifying purchases through our Amazon links. See also The WM Review Reading List.

Our explanation as to how and why we can be sure that the Holy See has been vacant since at least 1965.

(WM Review) – On Saturday 10 May 2025, Leo XIV set out the agenda for his reign over what he had previously called the “Synodal Church.” In this address, delivered to his cardinals, he affirmed his adherence to the revolution of Vatican II:

“In this regard, I would like us to renew together today our complete commitment to the path that the universal Church has now followed for decades in the wake of the Second Vatican Council.

“Pope Francis masterfully and concretely set it forth in the Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, from which I would like to highlight several fundamental points: the return to the primacy of Christ in proclamation (cf. No. 11); the missionary conversion of the entire Christian community (cf. No. 9); growth in collegiality and synodality (cf. No. 33); attention to the sensus fidei (cf. Nos. 119-120), especially in its most authentic and inclusive forms, such as popular piety (cf. No. 123); loving care for the least and the rejected (cf. No. 53); courageous and trusting dialogue with the contemporary world in its various components and realities (cf. No. 84; Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 1-2).”1

It should be clear that this “complete commitment” applies not just to “the path that the universal Church has now followed” since Vatican II, but also to Vatican II itself.

In addition to this address, Leo XIV has also referred to the documents of Vatican II on several occasions since his election.2

What are the implications of all these statements?


This was a WM+ article.

The WM Review is free for readers. This is because we believe these ideas must reach as many people as possible.

However, we also provide WM+ articles—additional material for those who choose to support this work financially. This helps us continue producing serious Catholic research, while ensuring that the main body of material remains accessible for all.

If you want to ensure that this flow of material continues, join WM+ today.

(Clergy and seminarians can contact us for free membership.)

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The WM Review
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture