The WM Review

The WM Review

Share this post

The WM Review
The WM Review
Pepino and Fimister attack Catholics rejecting Vatican II's novel religious liberty
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Pepino and Fimister attack Catholics rejecting Vatican II's novel religious liberty

The new edition of Abbé Lucien’s 'solution' to Vatican II includes unfortunate allegations against Catholics by John Pepino and Alan Fimister.

S.D. Wright's avatar
S.D. Wright
Jun 19, 2025
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

The WM Review
The WM Review
Pepino and Fimister attack Catholics rejecting Vatican II's novel religious liberty
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
1
Share
Par Unknown Miniaturist, French (active 1310s) — Bibliothèque en ligne Gallica sous l'identifiant ARK btv1b8447296x/f14, Public Domain. Wiki Commons.

The new edition of Abbé Lucien’s 'solution' to Vatican II includes unfortunate allegations against Catholics by John Pepino and Alan Fimister.

(WM+) – We recently published Abbé Hervé Belmont’s refutation of Abbé Bernard Lucien’s so-called “solution” to the problem posed by Vatican II’s teaching on religious liberty.

Lucien’s essays recently appeared in English, and have attracted the attention of those who have recognised the problem, and believe that the solution must lie in a reconciliation between the pre-conciliar teaching and that of Vatican II. Belmont deftly dispatches Lucien’s attempts.

Lucien refuted: 'Religious Liberty: Illusory Distinction, Unwarranted Conclusion'

Lucien refuted: 'Religious Liberty: Illusory Distinction, Unwarranted Conclusion'

Jun 18
Read full story

However, in introducing that piece, we noted that the new translation is preceded by some regrettable editorialising in the Translator’s Note by John Pepino, and the Foreword by Alan Fimister.

Pepino is a professor at the FSSP seminary in Denton, and a frequent speaker. He has previously translated books about the liturgical reform, which were published by Angelico Press.

Fimister is an assistant professor of theology. Readers may remember him for an article on anti-semitism in 2020, or his claim that “only the city of God, that is, the Catholic Church, is strictly a perfect society”—which runs contrary to the standard understanding through the Church’s political thought.1

In this piece, I would like to address some of the points raised against those who reject Dignitatis Humanae:

  1. Pepino claims that they are in “imperfect communion with the Holy See”

  2. Fimister’s claim that they are “apostates” and do not “possess the theological virtue of faith”

  3. The true solution to the problem of religious liberty.


The WM Review is free for readers. This is because we believe these ideas must reach as many people as possible.

However, we also provide WM+ articles—additional material for those who choose to support this work financially. This helps us continue producing serious Catholic research, while ensuring that the main body of material remains accessible for all.

If you want to ensure that this flow of material continues, join WM+ today.

(Clergy and seminarians can contact us for free membership.)

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The WM Review
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More