3 Comments
User's avatar
Sean Johnson's avatar

This:

“We should note that when Lefebvre prorogues the question to the future, our present is in fact his future. Some may interpret these words otherwise, but there does not seem to be anything in this text to suggest a prohibition on reaching clarity on the questions he raises, or to suggest that such clarity can only come from the hierarchy at some indefinite point in the future. In other words, there is nothing about the so-called “classical SSPX position” which requires us to stay, forever, on the practical plane.“

RosaryKnight's avatar

Very enlightening. I see why the counterfeit USCCB would want to suppress it.

Re- the (false) pontificate of Paul VI, he says, "How is it that a Pope, the true successor of Peter, assured of the assistance of the Holy Spirit, could preside at the destruction of the Church, the most profound and the most widespread in history to occur in so little space of time, that which no heretic has ever succeeded in doing?"

Heresy was already in fact taught by John XXIII, i.e. religious liberty in his encyclical Pacem in Terris (1963).

novusordowatch.org/john-xxiii

Austin George's avatar

“another religion, or rather another church, is operating within the structures of the Catholic Church, and that this church and the faith it propagates have nothing to do with Roman Catholicism.” sadly too many fall victim to this reality