He sounds like a near moron who refuses to see the contradictions he swims in and refuses to see that discussing Russian attacks and invasions the way he does is at this point irresponsible. Of course ignoring the history of Russia and much of the trad BS prop in favor of Putin is also a form of ignorance.
I watched some of the interview Tucknuts Imbecileson did with Mogg Rees and Mogg Rees made his points with more clarity. He is right that showing strength works with Putins and Hitlers and Maos etc but right now British strength is US strength as the whites of Europe have not properly invested in goods or morale or demographics. Without talking about that one can neither be truthful nor realistic. Carlson is a complete moron and wasting analysis on such a low IQ ignoramus is something I will not do.
HEY! Somebody PLEASE explain this to me like I'm five! This jerk...uh I mean...misguided fellow.. is acting like it's 1940, as are all his fellow Eurocrat crazies! How do get into a SHOOTING KINETIC war with a superpower armed to the teeth with a nuclear arsinal out of which maybe .01% of them could devasatate and completely ERADICATE civilization?!?!?! Not that NATO would not respond in kind, but that just makes the whole thing worse. Have we all forgotten that these missles can go 15,000 miles per hour and we have like 6 MINUTES to respond? How many cities can we lose in one afternoon? How many millions dead? Or is the doctrine of Mutually Assured DESTRUCTION some relic? Something just so...20th century??? I can't believe this! Oh, and don't you love that "Let's you and him fight" aspect to all this. No wonder Britain is such a basket case these days!
Yes. Just like the British fomented both WW1 and WW2 for the purpose of maintaining their physical and then financial empire, they are doing it again because Europe and the UK are broke. On one hand, war will allow them to write off their debt and reset the system, again, while on the other, these morons really think they’re going to lead some glorious army and finally bring the Russian bear to heel, break up “the empire,” and take all of its materiel resources. If you’re thinking “are they so dumb,” you are still sane.
Yes, this part tells you everything that you need to know about the man: "Rees-Mogg – ... started his career at J Rothschild Investment Management..." All of the rest makes sense after reading that.
Objectively, and in consideration of widespread revelations in recent years as to the ubiquity of the phenomenon, especially in "high places", the evidence points to his being a lifetime actor. The living embodiment of contradiction.
Hey, Mark. I'd like to apologize for being an idiot in my writings, I think mostly what I spoke was true however there were also evil motives and stupidity, so that's why I deleted them.
Anyway I did appreciate your comments. All the best to you.
Hi there! I too deleted my comments and sent Mawdsley a mea culpa. We simply cannot know the state of the subjects conscience even when we have objective knowledge that annulment generally is a grave scandal. Our eternal souls are worth more. God bless you!
I think it's possible to write of public figures, however it ought to be done precisely and charitably, even if they were enemies of the Faith. Sometimes I've wondered of this, where to draw the line, it's not always clear.
That being said, I have reservations of him. It's possible they're unfounded, and definitely not worth losing a soul over, but I still have some reservations.
Furthermore, whilst Rees Mogg has sufficient self control to appear almost one with his chair, hands glued to his knees, the phenomenon of "displacement activity" does betray that he's an actor reading a script. What betrays him to any amateur psychologist is the demented amount of blinking.
The country is bankrupt, financially and morally, and didn't manage to kill enough young men with the excess deaths caused by the abortion -tainted jabs that Mogg & Co inflicted. A phony war is a great way to increase the hit rate on those troublesome white boys, reset the collapsed financial system and make vast profits for some of the Mogg class. Mogg's cultivated cartoon persona is just a variation on the schtick of tatty headed Boris. They think no-one can see through it.
Hmm. I'm not too familiar with all these talking heads, what I do care about is that there's a marked increase in military build-up around here in Finland.
Why do I care? Well we're right next to Russia, so... We have a huge military reserve due to mandatory conscription, myself (once) included, so I would guess it will affect my own life which I wouldn't want to loose on a war for liberal democracy or whatever.
Since Putin and Russian oligarchy is owned by them too, and they often love to hang out in the west even now, I'd actually guess it's some kind of weird sacrifice anyway. Or maybe jewish mafia turf war.
I'd point out that here's been some weird things like laws that allow for sending conscripted soldiers into foreign countries now, so clearly they're preparing for something.
Interesting that they're doing same thing over there. They'll probably use violence and false flags and draconian laws to whip people into submission. Pray the rosary is what I'll try to do now.
Btw really went through those arguments for it being not communio in sacris attending FSSPX, I think you guys are wrong on this. Even the Ad Evitanda Scandala's explanatory notes by Benedict XIV are pretty clear on the mind of then-reigning Pontiff on what's ok and what's not.
Besides it largely seems to hinge on the point that there's reasonable doubt of FSSPX being heretical/schismatical. I don't think there's reasonable doubt after all. And also the una cum's meaning really doesn't seem to be intercessory prayer, which some people use to argue for it to be ok to attend such Masses in cases of necessity.
Not trying to make anyone's life more difficult, I just think there's likely grave sin since the conditions for theoretical admittance into communio in sacris in cases of necessity aren't honestly fulfilled when going to FSSPX. Sorry, but that's how it is.
Anyway, all the best to you guys, let's all make it through ww3 into heaven.
I've encountered that comment in various forms time and again from usually people intent on political change.
Russia was taken over by jewish interest groups already during revolution. They didn't disappear anywhere, well many went to state of Israel (funny thing how they alone could travel) but the communism was always favorable to jews. It was their system. Post-soviet Russia didn't lose its nature, as proven by the ruling jewish oligarch class and Putin's friends, and state propaganda too.
Chasing for example political change without recognizing that it's practically impossible without mass conversion and that judeomasonry has very strong position currently, is in my opinion at best waste of time and at worst, leading one astray.
That's maybe why I've encountered that comment often. I've met many people who believe in changing things politically, I used to be one. I don't believe so now. But this is not despair, nor losing one's agency, on the contrary. Not sure if I understood you correctly.
A consequence of abrogation (debatable) of the TLM and institution of the Novus Ordo is the difficulty in fulfilling the requirements of the Five First Saturdays throughout the world and loss of the graces necessary for peace, at least for those of us who have doubts about the Novus Ordo Missae which was not the Mass at the time of the Virgin's request. Having driven 450 miles round trip five consecutive first Saturdays several years ago and then Sundays following was indeed a hardship. Will have to do it again next Spring I guess. Part of the plan to get rid of the TLM along with not revealing the 3rd Secret? Who knows?
Hysterical lefty peacenik nonsense! There is no war against Putin and there isn't going to be one. How could there be? The Socialists have a massive majority in the House of Commons, and they have literally said that they would rather spend money on social security than on national security. Putin's a Communist. They're Communists. Why would they care if he rebuilds the Soviet Union? George Galloway and David Paulden would cheer him all the way.
I don't know what this means, or what it has to do with what I said. There are ethnic Russians all over the world, including in the UK. But the West is not at war with Russia. It's not going to go to war with Russia. Indeed, it's not actually capable of going to war against anyone. Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine is in Europe. Therefore there is now a war in Europe. The Americans could put a stop to it in a couple of months. But they're not going to. Any questions?
I think you're making the perfect the enemy of the good. Rees Mogg is far from the worst among the current political class. In these times, apparently sound politicians turn out to be the most corrupt. Eccentricity is the only issue with Rees Mogg, meaning more might discount his views. Anyhow, state has a right in wartime, to preventively detain those who give aid and comfort to the enemy. These are not dissidents but subversives and traitors. There's nothing traditional about letting such people wreak havoc. Russia's GRU oversees criminals and useful idiot who engage in sabotage throughout Europe, targeting particularly companies with Ukrainian contracts. Breaking these networks shouldn't be held up with an excess of legalities.
The U.K. is not the good guy in this matter. The Ukraine was a proxy for the City of London since its establishment more than a century ago, created to be an irritant against the Czar and then reactivated against the post-Soviet Russian federation.
Terminally online, paranoid nonsense. Russia, or really Muscovy (which it called itself until the 17th century alongside the large and utterly Ukrainian Cossack Hetmanate) repeatedly tried to suppress the Ukrainian identity over centuries. Peter I, murderer of his son and a Catholic priest, tried to ban the Ukrainian form of Old Church Slavonic. Again and again afterwards, Tsars tried to suppress what had been the actual homeland of the Rus. Muscovy was just a tax gatherer for the Golden Horde and succeeded to its empire. Given that this is a Catholic blog, the Russian Orthodox Church (leaving aside that it's basically an FSB front founded in 1943) is utterly heretical and a brutal persecutor of Catholics.
The ostensibly Catholic British aristocracy have had a bad habit of using Catholicism just enough to allow them to keep their fortunes and their parishes in the face of exceedingly hostile Protestant, Masonic, and liberal governments. Remember where the error of religious liberty came from; hint, not the United States.
He sounds like a near moron who refuses to see the contradictions he swims in and refuses to see that discussing Russian attacks and invasions the way he does is at this point irresponsible. Of course ignoring the history of Russia and much of the trad BS prop in favor of Putin is also a form of ignorance.
Yes, agreed.
Reality bites but there are better ways to handle it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh7jXh-lnOA
I watched some of the interview Tucknuts Imbecileson did with Mogg Rees and Mogg Rees made his points with more clarity. He is right that showing strength works with Putins and Hitlers and Maos etc but right now British strength is US strength as the whites of Europe have not properly invested in goods or morale or demographics. Without talking about that one can neither be truthful nor realistic. Carlson is a complete moron and wasting analysis on such a low IQ ignoramus is something I will not do.
HEY! Somebody PLEASE explain this to me like I'm five! This jerk...uh I mean...misguided fellow.. is acting like it's 1940, as are all his fellow Eurocrat crazies! How do get into a SHOOTING KINETIC war with a superpower armed to the teeth with a nuclear arsinal out of which maybe .01% of them could devasatate and completely ERADICATE civilization?!?!?! Not that NATO would not respond in kind, but that just makes the whole thing worse. Have we all forgotten that these missles can go 15,000 miles per hour and we have like 6 MINUTES to respond? How many cities can we lose in one afternoon? How many millions dead? Or is the doctrine of Mutually Assured DESTRUCTION some relic? Something just so...20th century??? I can't believe this! Oh, and don't you love that "Let's you and him fight" aspect to all this. No wonder Britain is such a basket case these days!
Yes. Just like the British fomented both WW1 and WW2 for the purpose of maintaining their physical and then financial empire, they are doing it again because Europe and the UK are broke. On one hand, war will allow them to write off their debt and reset the system, again, while on the other, these morons really think they’re going to lead some glorious army and finally bring the Russian bear to heel, break up “the empire,” and take all of its materiel resources. If you’re thinking “are they so dumb,” you are still sane.
He's not a visible member of the Catholic Church.
Jacob Rees Smug. Boris Johnson is part of the club and so is he.
Teeing up the global chaos initiative going into 2030.
One word illuminate the whole article, and the same word throw a dark shadow on that person Mogg. It begins with "R" and ends with an "d".
Yes, this part tells you everything that you need to know about the man: "Rees-Mogg – ... started his career at J Rothschild Investment Management..." All of the rest makes sense after reading that.
Another Gog-Magog tap-dancer. No young or not so young men should sign up to become sacrifices for Macbeth.
Objectively, and in consideration of widespread revelations in recent years as to the ubiquity of the phenomenon, especially in "high places", the evidence points to his being a lifetime actor. The living embodiment of contradiction.
Hey, Mark. I'd like to apologize for being an idiot in my writings, I think mostly what I spoke was true however there were also evil motives and stupidity, so that's why I deleted them.
Anyway I did appreciate your comments. All the best to you.
Hi there! I too deleted my comments and sent Mawdsley a mea culpa. We simply cannot know the state of the subjects conscience even when we have objective knowledge that annulment generally is a grave scandal. Our eternal souls are worth more. God bless you!
I think it's possible to write of public figures, however it ought to be done precisely and charitably, even if they were enemies of the Faith. Sometimes I've wondered of this, where to draw the line, it's not always clear.
That being said, I have reservations of him. It's possible they're unfounded, and definitely not worth losing a soul over, but I still have some reservations.
Furthermore, whilst Rees Mogg has sufficient self control to appear almost one with his chair, hands glued to his knees, the phenomenon of "displacement activity" does betray that he's an actor reading a script. What betrays him to any amateur psychologist is the demented amount of blinking.
The country is bankrupt, financially and morally, and didn't manage to kill enough young men with the excess deaths caused by the abortion -tainted jabs that Mogg & Co inflicted. A phony war is a great way to increase the hit rate on those troublesome white boys, reset the collapsed financial system and make vast profits for some of the Mogg class. Mogg's cultivated cartoon persona is just a variation on the schtick of tatty headed Boris. They think no-one can see through it.
Hmm. I'm not too familiar with all these talking heads, what I do care about is that there's a marked increase in military build-up around here in Finland.
Why do I care? Well we're right next to Russia, so... We have a huge military reserve due to mandatory conscription, myself (once) included, so I would guess it will affect my own life which I wouldn't want to loose on a war for liberal democracy or whatever.
Since Putin and Russian oligarchy is owned by them too, and they often love to hang out in the west even now, I'd actually guess it's some kind of weird sacrifice anyway. Or maybe jewish mafia turf war.
I'd point out that here's been some weird things like laws that allow for sending conscripted soldiers into foreign countries now, so clearly they're preparing for something.
Interesting that they're doing same thing over there. They'll probably use violence and false flags and draconian laws to whip people into submission. Pray the rosary is what I'll try to do now.
Btw really went through those arguments for it being not communio in sacris attending FSSPX, I think you guys are wrong on this. Even the Ad Evitanda Scandala's explanatory notes by Benedict XIV are pretty clear on the mind of then-reigning Pontiff on what's ok and what's not.
Besides it largely seems to hinge on the point that there's reasonable doubt of FSSPX being heretical/schismatical. I don't think there's reasonable doubt after all. And also the una cum's meaning really doesn't seem to be intercessory prayer, which some people use to argue for it to be ok to attend such Masses in cases of necessity.
Not trying to make anyone's life more difficult, I just think there's likely grave sin since the conditions for theoretical admittance into communio in sacris in cases of necessity aren't honestly fulfilled when going to FSSPX. Sorry, but that's how it is.
Anyway, all the best to you guys, let's all make it through ww3 into heaven.
What led you to that conclusion in the second part of your comment?
The oligarchs don’t rule Russia anymore. And blaming “the Jews” is a ploy to get you to give up your agency and fall into despair.
I've encountered that comment in various forms time and again from usually people intent on political change.
Russia was taken over by jewish interest groups already during revolution. They didn't disappear anywhere, well many went to state of Israel (funny thing how they alone could travel) but the communism was always favorable to jews. It was their system. Post-soviet Russia didn't lose its nature, as proven by the ruling jewish oligarch class and Putin's friends, and state propaganda too.
Chasing for example political change without recognizing that it's practically impossible without mass conversion and that judeomasonry has very strong position currently, is in my opinion at best waste of time and at worst, leading one astray.
That's maybe why I've encountered that comment often. I've met many people who believe in changing things politically, I used to be one. I don't believe so now. But this is not despair, nor losing one's agency, on the contrary. Not sure if I understood you correctly.
A consequence of abrogation (debatable) of the TLM and institution of the Novus Ordo is the difficulty in fulfilling the requirements of the Five First Saturdays throughout the world and loss of the graces necessary for peace, at least for those of us who have doubts about the Novus Ordo Missae which was not the Mass at the time of the Virgin's request. Having driven 450 miles round trip five consecutive first Saturdays several years ago and then Sundays following was indeed a hardship. Will have to do it again next Spring I guess. Part of the plan to get rid of the TLM along with not revealing the 3rd Secret? Who knows?
Yes. It is hard. Do what you can.
Hysterical lefty peacenik nonsense! There is no war against Putin and there isn't going to be one. How could there be? The Socialists have a massive majority in the House of Commons, and they have literally said that they would rather spend money on social security than on national security. Putin's a Communist. They're Communists. Why would they care if he rebuilds the Soviet Union? George Galloway and David Paulden would cheer him all the way.
1. There are no ethnic Russians outside of ethnic Russian areas of Eastern Europe, which I last checked did not include the U.K.
2. NATO-backed governments were not actively bombing areas referenced in 1. above.
3. Ergo by 1. and 2., no “invasion of Europe” by Russia.
That’s the analysis.
Incidentally, the EU has no problem paying Russia while at the same time clamoring for war, something to the tune of 1/3 trillion Euros.
I don't know what this means, or what it has to do with what I said. There are ethnic Russians all over the world, including in the UK. But the West is not at war with Russia. It's not going to go to war with Russia. Indeed, it's not actually capable of going to war against anyone. Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine is in Europe. Therefore there is now a war in Europe. The Americans could put a stop to it in a couple of months. But they're not going to. Any questions?
I think the title of this article should remove the name "Catholic."
I think you're making the perfect the enemy of the good. Rees Mogg is far from the worst among the current political class. In these times, apparently sound politicians turn out to be the most corrupt. Eccentricity is the only issue with Rees Mogg, meaning more might discount his views. Anyhow, state has a right in wartime, to preventively detain those who give aid and comfort to the enemy. These are not dissidents but subversives and traitors. There's nothing traditional about letting such people wreak havoc. Russia's GRU oversees criminals and useful idiot who engage in sabotage throughout Europe, targeting particularly companies with Ukrainian contracts. Breaking these networks shouldn't be held up with an excess of legalities.
The U.K. is not the good guy in this matter. The Ukraine was a proxy for the City of London since its establishment more than a century ago, created to be an irritant against the Czar and then reactivated against the post-Soviet Russian federation.
Terminally online, paranoid nonsense. Russia, or really Muscovy (which it called itself until the 17th century alongside the large and utterly Ukrainian Cossack Hetmanate) repeatedly tried to suppress the Ukrainian identity over centuries. Peter I, murderer of his son and a Catholic priest, tried to ban the Ukrainian form of Old Church Slavonic. Again and again afterwards, Tsars tried to suppress what had been the actual homeland of the Rus. Muscovy was just a tax gatherer for the Golden Horde and succeeded to its empire. Given that this is a Catholic blog, the Russian Orthodox Church (leaving aside that it's basically an FSB front founded in 1943) is utterly heretical and a brutal persecutor of Catholics.
The ostensibly Catholic British aristocracy have had a bad habit of using Catholicism just enough to allow them to keep their fortunes and their parishes in the face of exceedingly hostile Protestant, Masonic, and liberal governments. Remember where the error of religious liberty came from; hint, not the United States.