Ratzinger must have been under great pressure, possibly even blackmail, since he credibly, I believe, told a close priest friend, Fr Ingo Dollinger: that the Third Secret of Fatima included the foretelling of "a bad council and a bad mass":
And that of course can only happen under a false pope. Which supports the theory, itself supported by a good amount of evidence, that there was a valid pope in exile while "Saints" John XXIII & especially Paul VI were creating a counterfeit church.
4 marks. Very simple. I learned the 4 marks in grade school when “Catholic schools” were actually Catholic. One? Nope! Holy? Not even close. Catholic or universal? Again nada. If I went to a NO in a foreign country I’d not understand a word.
Apostolic? Gimme a break. The hierarchy of the Synodal institution reject many teachings of the apostles. Romans 1? James?
This is simple 1st grade Catholic teaching. The 4 marks. Someday perhaps the laity attending the NO will have a lightbulb moment. “What my parish isn’t Catholic? But the sign says… “
It makes me chuckle when Dr K calls anything a ‘definitive rebuttal’. This is a bloke who ‘rethinks’ absolutes like Paris rethinks fashion.
Ratzinger must have been under great pressure, possibly even blackmail, since he credibly, I believe, told a close priest friend, Fr Ingo Dollinger: that the Third Secret of Fatima included the foretelling of "a bad council and a bad mass":
onepeterfive.com/cardinal-ratzinger-not-published-whole-third-secret-fatima
And that of course can only happen under a false pope. Which supports the theory, itself supported by a good amount of evidence, that there was a valid pope in exile while "Saints" John XXIII & especially Paul VI were creating a counterfeit church.
novusordowatch.org/john-xxiii (a few links there with "1958" in them explain how such a thing could happen)
Once again Rosary Knight, an excellent reply. Thanks.
And of course, the 3rd Secret. What is the Synodal institution afraid will come out? Ah yes! The truth.
4 marks. Very simple. I learned the 4 marks in grade school when “Catholic schools” were actually Catholic. One? Nope! Holy? Not even close. Catholic or universal? Again nada. If I went to a NO in a foreign country I’d not understand a word.
Apostolic? Gimme a break. The hierarchy of the Synodal institution reject many teachings of the apostles. Romans 1? James?
This is simple 1st grade Catholic teaching. The 4 marks. Someday perhaps the laity attending the NO will have a lightbulb moment. “What my parish isn’t Catholic? But the sign says… “