The matter I'm explaining is the non-identity of the CS Church with the Catholic Church. The absence of the properties do indeed denote a rupture of mission and jurisdiction on the part of those within the CS Church who have separated themselves from the Church.
I don't understand your comment. I haven't been redefining the notes. I've been showing how they can be obscured, and how they can be shown to be absent. I am arguing that they are shown to be absent in the Conciliar/Synodal Church as I have defined it. Therefore it's not the visible Church. But the true Church, which is not defined by the boundaries of the C/S Church remains visible, whilst also being obscured. It seems like you're disagreeing with me whilst asserting what I'm saying.
"...it is commonly assumed that a significant number of the Conciliar/Synodal Church’s ministers are homosexuals, and that at least a notable minority act upon such predilections."
A minority? I doubt that very much.
"...the Conciliar/Synodal Church abandoned a stringent process of canonisation, and replaced it with a procedure of much lower standards."
The most egregious change was the elimination, for ulterior motives, I'm sure, of the important "Devil's Advocate" from the canonization process by JPII, thus fast-tracking his own & others' false canonizations, or as Louie Verrecchio from akacatholic.com calls them, "Conciliar Lifetime Achievement Awards for Service to the Revolution."
And as for "Those whose lives were marked by truly horrific crimes (e.g., Paul VI and his religious revolution," one should also note that he was an unchaste homosexual.
Sorry Louis, you say "the question is not ~~~" but I will decide the question I want to answer in a given piece.
The matter I'm explaining is the non-identity of the CS Church with the Catholic Church. The absence of the properties do indeed denote a rupture of mission and jurisdiction on the part of those within the CS Church who have separated themselves from the Church.
I don't understand your comment. I haven't been redefining the notes. I've been showing how they can be obscured, and how they can be shown to be absent. I am arguing that they are shown to be absent in the Conciliar/Synodal Church as I have defined it. Therefore it's not the visible Church. But the true Church, which is not defined by the boundaries of the C/S Church remains visible, whilst also being obscured. It seems like you're disagreeing with me whilst asserting what I'm saying.
Saving this...
Excellent article, thank you.
"...it is commonly assumed that a significant number of the Conciliar/Synodal Church’s ministers are homosexuals, and that at least a notable minority act upon such predilections."
A minority? I doubt that very much.
"...the Conciliar/Synodal Church abandoned a stringent process of canonisation, and replaced it with a procedure of much lower standards."
The most egregious change was the elimination, for ulterior motives, I'm sure, of the important "Devil's Advocate" from the canonization process by JPII, thus fast-tracking his own & others' false canonizations, or as Louie Verrecchio from akacatholic.com calls them, "Conciliar Lifetime Achievement Awards for Service to the Revolution."
And as for "Those whose lives were marked by truly horrific crimes (e.g., Paul VI and his religious revolution," one should also note that he was an unchaste homosexual.
traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_094_MontiniHomo.html (also 2 other related short articles there)
Again, you are disagreeing with some I didn't write, and opposing to it points which I did write.