12 Comments
User's avatar
Katherine's avatar

Is this all preparation for Antichrist? Would the papacy need to be laid aside to welcome the Antichrist?

Expand full comment
Darrell Goodliffe's avatar

Close but not quite….the Anti Christ is not the only Last Days figure to champion the Adversary…he will be heavily supported by the False Prophet who will lead one world religion and yes these reforms seem to pave fhe way for that….see also the Fatima Prophecies….if that is the case though they can’t be stopped as they are part of the plan for salvation

Expand full comment
RosaryKnight's avatar

Actually overthrowing the papacy was first necessary, which is what happened in 1958 by the Judeo-Masonic powers under Satan, although most sedes are reticent about that, even though a heretic can never be elected pope, nor can a pope become a heretic.

novusordowatch.org/2016/10/smoke-signals-white-smoke-1958

whitesmoke1958.com

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

Yes, I know the papacy has been vacant but I mean for the rest of the world to see the papacy as no longer having authority.

Expand full comment
RosaryKnight's avatar

That's probably their intention. It's overkill, but they want any vestige of Catholicism eliminated, also to prevent a true pope from taking office some day.

For what it's worth, Blessed Anna Maria Taigi prophesied that Sts Peter & Paul will appear in Rome to the astonishment of all & appoint a pope after a long period with the Chair of Peter held by false popes.

This is from Feeneyite MHFM but I think it's worth watching: "Did The Bible Predict 70 Years Without A Pope?"

youtube.com/watch?v=p2xYLg0M2LY&t=774s

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

Thank you- I will check it out.

Expand full comment
Jack Phillip's avatar

These TLM bloggers be so butthurt!

Expand full comment
Voco Veritas's avatar

Bergoglio, Prevost, and all the heretics in the ape of the church can call it whatever they want, synodal or otherwise. It does not change the FACT that is it HERESY which means they have all excommunicated themselves by the pertinacious profession of heresy.

Expand full comment
Sonia's avatar

Is a non-Catholic subject to excommunication?

Expand full comment
Voco Veritas's avatar

How can someone who is not Catholic be separated from something to which it does not belong?

Expand full comment
S.D. Wright's avatar

It depends. A non-baptised isn't excommunicated. Anyone who expresses heresy is, although this excommunicstion doesn't render them a non-Catholic. Then, the open heretic is a non-Catholic by virtue of his heresy, not his excommunication. One who is excommunicated with a "perfect" excommunication and as a vitandus, or who lays violent hands on the pope, is outside the Church.

Expand full comment
Sonia's avatar
1dEdited

Ratzinger called V2 the French Revolution in the Church. It has cruelly and efficiently 'beheaded' Catholic authority and established a beast.

Expand full comment