Great text! I received it in my email and couldn't put it down. Over the past few months, I've been trying to get in touch with some of the "continuist" opinions, and this gave me food for thought.
I mean more generally those who don't see a rupture between pre- and post-Vatican II teaching, and more specifically those who subscribe to the hermeneutic of continuity. I wasn't being too precise.
What does Daly mean by dogmatic sedevacantist? There are 2 meanings I can think of, one if very insulting and one I would agree with.
I don't find anywhere I can ask him.... I tried on his page and got nothing.
I thought repeat thought I saw him say " Cardinal " Burke could be a Catholic. How? I guess it might be so .... I think someone with his training should know the Catholic Church is Spotless and a Pope could never give poison to the entire faithful.
The Church will look at Burke and people with his background as enemies who extended Gr Apost.
Finally, last one… I am sincererly intersted in these - and I have had no success in getting to him, and i have tried
Daly seems unique in top sede thinkes (and he most certainly is briliant ) in not being able to be contacted easily.
The writers of this blog are top writers of sedev. also and have more access than me, a nobody. But becuase I am a nobody does not mean i don’t care about Rome/ my local apostate church, / apostate pastors
I saw his name, and I have some questions that have really bothered me.
Do you have a problem with this? He is a historical, public figure during Great Apostasy, one of top 10 events in history about most important institution on earth, ever,and I thing the dogmatic sede term he coined- I darn well have a right to know about it.
I find it possibly, depending on how he meant it, well…
I TRIED TO CONTACT HIM. I certainly would have like to ask him a few years ago.
I'm just trying to understand your thought process as your comments aren't easy to follow and don't bear any relation to what was written in the article on which you are commenting.
Every man has a right to a good reputation. It'd be best if you kept your comments about Mr Daly to yourself as some of them could be misinterpreted.
My friend tells me that he does respond to emails though he is incredibly busy and it might take more than 6 months for him to get back to you. You might try contacting him again directly, making sure that you have any concerns that you might have well referenced as no author is going to be able to comment about everything they've ever written.
Responding in all caps is the equivalent of yelling and I would encourage you to refrain from doing so.
I don't think any of us have a private right for someone who has written something to explain it to us perfectly and in private. Or to demand a public response. That's just not how things work.
As for the term, I don't see what's mysterious about it. Dogmatic means pertaining to dogma. There are those who think the vacancy is itself a dogma, such that denying it is heresy. This then leads to various behaviours such as sectarianism or shunning people. Mr Daly was involved such things in his youth and is on public record refuting them. There's no mystery here.
Why do you call a non Catholic by name of Cardinal? He is an apostate and ememy of Christ.
It has nothing to do with the article - it has to do wiht Daly. I don't like that he said if (if I am wrong, I will grovel in my apology)… to say that Burke might be a cardinal rips out every thing HE has said about sede, and he has been very beautiful in his defense/ explanation of sedev. And then he drops the Burke comment
I will look at the article - ty very much. of course, I very well doubt I can ask him anything if I have any questions. He is very unique in this regard.
Great text! I received it in my email and couldn't put it down. Over the past few months, I've been trying to get in touch with some of the "continuist" opinions, and this gave me food for thought.
what do you mean by continuist opionion?
I have heard this over 15 times as I loved the sede conference he did, so I did not read it
I mean more generally those who don't see a rupture between pre- and post-Vatican II teaching, and more specifically those who subscribe to the hermeneutic of continuity. I wasn't being too precise.
+Williamson on the hermeneutic: “Blue jerseys will be interpreted as green jerseys.”
ty! gotcha. 1958 sedes who accept bod are the best
What does Daly mean by dogmatic sedevacantist? There are 2 meanings I can think of, one if very insulting and one I would agree with.
I don't find anywhere I can ask him.... I tried on his page and got nothing.
I thought repeat thought I saw him say " Cardinal " Burke could be a Catholic. How? I guess it might be so .... I think someone with his training should know the Catholic Church is Spotless and a Pope could never give poison to the entire faithful.
The Church will look at Burke and people with his background as enemies who extended Gr Apost.
Daly to me has written as if he is two persons, one an objective and very tough yet fair sedevacantist who I love. And then someone else.
Why are you raising these points about John Daly in public? For what purpose?
I have always been curious about him. He puts out some very good stuff, but then a small percentage of very doubtful stuffl
Like he put out there that Burke could be a Catholic. But then he should be open to quetions on such stuff… and he’s not. Frustrating.
And dogmatic sede - that could be very very wrong if he meant it in one sense.
But he puts it out there and then we are just left with it
Finally, last one… I am sincererly intersted in these - and I have had no success in getting to him, and i have tried
Daly seems unique in top sede thinkes (and he most certainly is briliant ) in not being able to be contacted easily.
The writers of this blog are top writers of sedev. also and have more access than me, a nobody. But becuase I am a nobody does not mean i don’t care about Rome/ my local apostate church, / apostate pastors
There is no mention of "dogmatic sedevacantist" in this article. Where are you citing this term from?
There is sectarian sedevacantism, but that is something that he has written about at length: https://romeward.com/articles/239750151/moderate-sedevacantism-versus-sectarian-sedevacantism-a-summary-of-the-disputed-issues
What does Cardinal Burke have to do with the teaching on the papacy? He isn't even a putative Pope?
True. This is a great piece from Sede Conference.
I saw his name, and I have some questions that have really bothered me.
Do you have a problem with this? He is a historical, public figure during Great Apostasy, one of top 10 events in history about most important institution on earth, ever,and I thing the dogmatic sede term he coined- I darn well have a right to know about it.
I find it possibly, depending on how he meant it, well…
I TRIED TO CONTACT HIM. I certainly would have like to ask him a few years ago.
Hey John,
I'm just trying to understand your thought process as your comments aren't easy to follow and don't bear any relation to what was written in the article on which you are commenting.
Every man has a right to a good reputation. It'd be best if you kept your comments about Mr Daly to yourself as some of them could be misinterpreted.
My friend tells me that he does respond to emails though he is incredibly busy and it might take more than 6 months for him to get back to you. You might try contacting him again directly, making sure that you have any concerns that you might have well referenced as no author is going to be able to comment about everything they've ever written.
Responding in all caps is the equivalent of yelling and I would encourage you to refrain from doing so.
I don't think any of us have a private right for someone who has written something to explain it to us perfectly and in private. Or to demand a public response. That's just not how things work.
As for the term, I don't see what's mysterious about it. Dogmatic means pertaining to dogma. There are those who think the vacancy is itself a dogma, such that denying it is heresy. This then leads to various behaviours such as sectarianism or shunning people. Mr Daly was involved such things in his youth and is on public record refuting them. There's no mystery here.
Why do you call a non Catholic by name of Cardinal? He is an apostate and ememy of Christ.
It has nothing to do with the article - it has to do wiht Daly. I don't like that he said if (if I am wrong, I will grovel in my apology)… to say that Burke might be a cardinal rips out every thing HE has said about sede, and he has been very beautiful in his defense/ explanation of sedev. And then he drops the Burke comment
I will look at the article - ty very much. of course, I very well doubt I can ask him anything if I have any questions. He is very unique in this regard.
"Benedict XVI at least can be relied upon to acknowledge that we are exercising our natural right to religious liberty by doing so."
I'm not sure I understand the context of this statement. What does BXVI have to do with anything?
It was written under his reign