After the Vatican announced the alleged excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre and the other bishops involved in the 1988 episcopal consecrations, the SSPX's superiors hit back – hard.
It is inconceivable that today’s SSPX could support such a letter, but we are told nothing has changed, and are treated to gaslighting operations like their recent article “Semper Idem” (“Always the Same”).
Yet a cursory review of the signatories of this letter reveal names of some of the neo-SSPX’s most vociferous apologists for a practical accord: Schmidberger, Simoulin, Aulagnier, +Fellay, Laisney,Lorans, Couture.
I suppose they figured this letter was simply too well remembered to memory-hole it, as they have done with so many other articles which highlight the contrast between today’s SSPX with that of former years.
It is inconceivable that today’s SSPX could support such a letter, but we are told nothing has changed, and are treated to gaslighting operations like their recent article “Semper Idem” (“Always the Same”).
Yet a cursory review of the signatories of this letter reveal names of some of the neo-SSPX’s most vociferous apologists for a practical accord: Schmidberger, Simoulin, Aulagnier, +Fellay, Laisney,Lorans, Couture.
I suppose they figured this letter was simply too well remembered to memory-hole it, as they have done with so many other articles which highlight the contrast between today’s SSPX with that of former years.