Is “it” a new religion? Well we could start with what it “is not!” It
absolutely 100 % is not the Church founded by Jesus and built on the blood of the martyrs. That much is evident to a blind person. I don’t care how much the” M & M boys” (Matt and Marshall) try to whitewash the obvious dirt it isn’t the Catholic Church. Excuse TM however as he’s steeped in Protestant theology, taking a verse and making it a bar of spiritual Ivory soap. Of course the financial incentive to “teach” us poor, dumb, relics, AKA traditional Catholics the “truth” was just too juicy to pass up.
I was going to say something similar. Used to like Taylor many moons ago, but he’s just so full of himself and really doesn’t know much of anything other than how to bloviate.
Get ready to pull your hair out: The SSPX explains why the sedevacantist position is naive, destroys visibility, and defends itself against charges of violating disciplinary infallibility:
"First Phenomenon: It has happened a few times that when those previously sympathetic to the SSPX decide to pivot, they tend to set their sights on "sedevacantists" first – with their criticisms being a kind of "trial balloon" before the full pivot is unveiled." Well spotted.
The Marshall 'pontificate' is much like Prevost's - you just make a declaration and that's Katholicism.
Is “it” a new religion? Well we could start with what it “is not!” It
absolutely 100 % is not the Church founded by Jesus and built on the blood of the martyrs. That much is evident to a blind person. I don’t care how much the” M & M boys” (Matt and Marshall) try to whitewash the obvious dirt it isn’t the Catholic Church. Excuse TM however as he’s steeped in Protestant theology, taking a verse and making it a bar of spiritual Ivory soap. Of course the financial incentive to “teach” us poor, dumb, relics, AKA traditional Catholics the “truth” was just too juicy to pass up.
Taylor Marshall cannot be trusted for any information whatsoever!!! He does not understand the principles of Catholicism.
I was going to say something similar. Used to like Taylor many moons ago, but he’s just so full of himself and really doesn’t know much of anything other than how to bloviate.
Get ready to pull your hair out: The SSPX explains why the sedevacantist position is naive, destroys visibility, and defends itself against charges of violating disciplinary infallibility:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dUt1q0D9qM0
Luckily that is already 4 years old ;)
"First Phenomenon: It has happened a few times that when those previously sympathetic to the SSPX decide to pivot, they tend to set their sights on "sedevacantists" first – with their criticisms being a kind of "trial balloon" before the full pivot is unveiled." Well spotted.
The Marshall 'pontificate' is much like Prevost's - you just make a declaration and that's Katholicism.
Sean, has this series been turned into an audio podcast? If it hasn't can you ask permission from Stephen to turn it into a WM Review audio podcast?
Yeah i’ll speak to him
Thanks, I've been enjoying listening to them and I think others will too.